In 2017, she was selected as a legal rebel of the American Bar Association – a group of «innovators who are reshaping the legal profession.» She is a two-time recipient of the California Lawyer Attorney of the Year (CLAY) Award (2000 and 2014). Civil legal aid helps ensure fairness for everyone involved in the justice system, no matter how much money you have. It provides access to legal aid to people to protect their livelihoods, health and families. Civil legal assistance connects Americans to a range of services, including legal advice and advocacy, self-help centers and other court services, free legal clinics and pro bono support, as well as access to online information and forms that guide them through complex court proceedings. In this way, civil legal aid helps Americans protect their livelihoods, health, and families. Lainey uses her Twitter and LinkedIn accounts to build a community and share information about the digital justice space for accessibility, collaborative problem solving, and disability rights. She credits Twitter for helping to create and grow the vibrant global digital accessibility community. Lainey Feingold is a popular speaker on the digital justice space for accessibility, structured negotiation and best practices for organizations that want to practice disability inclusion and avoid accessibility lawsuits. It provides speeches, other presentations, and training at conferences, meetings, webinars, CLE courses, and courses inside and outside the United States. Lainey is also an international consultant and speaker and trainer on topics such as collaborative problem solving (structured negotiation), legal space for digital accessibility, accessible procurement, and best practices for integrating digital accessibility into the policies and practices of large and small organizations. Read what others are saying about Lainey Feingold`s lectures and trainings. The dolphins swimming at the top of Lainey`s website are there for a reason. People often associate shark-like behavior as necessary for effective advocacy.
Laine experience says otherwise. (2) If Article 1 of Directive 2000/78 were to be interpreted as meaning that religion and belief are two facets of the same criterion of protection, that would prevent the national court from adopting a provision of national law such as [Article 4(2) of Directive 2000/78] in accordance with Article 8 of that directive and in order to avoid a lowering of the level of protection against discrimination. 4 of the General Anti-Discrimination Act]? What does it mean that religious, philosophical and political beliefs are separate protected criteria? 16 That requirement of neutrality is set out in Article 46 of the SCRL`s working regime, according to which `workers undertake to comply with the undertaking`s strict policy of neutrality` and that they `shall therefore ensure that their religion, philosophical or political convictions, whatever they may be`, are respected`. There aren`t many people who know more about the disability and digital accessibility landscape than Lainey Feingold – so we were thrilled when she attended a fireside chat with LinkedIn`s co-founder to talk about the future of work. Lainey has a real knack for talking to both accessibility experts and beginners, engaging both audiences, and learning more. The conversation was filled with rich ideas, great answers to our burning questions, and a truly safe space for our employees to share their thoughts. Not only for lawyers, the book offers an effective and revolutionary method for resolving disputes without lawsuits and reducing conflicts and costs of submitted cases. The strategies include practical tips and tools to remove barriers and promote digital accessibility and inclusion of persons with disabilities. Read what people are saying about Lainey`s book. 63 Since the present proceedings constitute, for the parties to the main proceedings, an intermediate stage in the proceedings pending before the national court, the decision on costs is a matter for that court. The costs incurred in submitting observations to the Court of Justice, with the exception of those incurred by those parties, shall not be reimbursed.
`For the purposes of this Law: 55 Since the ground of discrimination based on «religion or belief» applies equally to all workers, a segmented view of that ground consistent with the objective pursued by the legislation at issue would lead to the formation of subcategories of workers and, therefore, the general framework of equal treatment in employment and occupation established by Directive 2000/78 has been undermined. Welcome to the website of Lainey Feingold. Lainey is a disability rights lawyer who has been working to make the digital world more accessible since 1995. She helped negotiate the first Web Accessibility Agreement in the United States in 2000. Read a short summary of this page. 30 By its third question, which it is appropriate to examine, in the second place, the referring court asks, in essence, whether Article 2(2)(a) of the Treaty or Article 2(2) of the Sixth Directive (a) of Directive 2000/78 must be interpreted as meaning that a provision relating to the working conditions of an undertaking which prohibits employees from expressing their philosophical or political convictions, irrespective of these beliefs, constitutes direct discrimination `well-founded: religion or belief` within the meaning of this Directive.